Explain whether you agree of disagree about open book tests being more difficult than traditional tests. What can you do to better prepare
for your next open book test?

Needs to be atleast 40 words

As per my opinion, open-book tests are a little harder than traditional tests.

Open-book tests provide books, notes as well as other assessments material to the students before the exam so that they get prepared for their answers. On the other hand, traditional tests do not allow for using books for giving the exam.  

Here, the open book requires students' ability to analyze and employ their learning skills to find out the appropriate answers as per questions. Thus, the student must be able to comprehend and understand the study material in the given time period.

The traditional book test only requires the remembering of the answers and also directly answering the clarifying questions.

Thus, students may prepare for the open book test by effectively remembering the topics, heading, and connecting information.

Learn more about the examination and assessment of students here:

link

I disagree of open book tests being harder than traditional tests; what is open book tests to you? On every answer do you get to cheat to use your book? I disagree, because on the final tests or the STAAR tests, you won't be using open book. What will you do then, if you only use open book?  Traditional tests you won't have any book, not one. What will you do then, if you switched from always open books to a normal, better traditional test? Students need to be more prepared; schools can't let them cheat. Open book tests are just something the teachers give to their students to make it easier. This is why I believe open book tests are much easier than traditional tests, that is why I fully disagree when you say that Open Book tests are harder than traditional test.

Can I have brainliest or no

nervous or scared i would say

hope this ! (if thats not it give me the answer choices)

in   ¨and yet the books¨   by czelaw miloz the tone is positive since it tells us that when we touch a book, it starts to live and the perspective is in the third person and turns once into the first person. in "the rhinoceros" by eugene ionesco the tone is illogical and absurd   and the perspective is in the third person since it is a play.