subject
English, 15.04.2020 02:59 saniyawilliams1207

Come amongst you, as you see, at this
time, not for my recreation and disport,
but being resolved in the midst and heat
of the battle, to live or die among you all
to lay down for my God, and for my
kingdoms, and for my people, my
honour, and my blood, even in the dust.
misliked it very much, and thought it in
you a very great presumption, being
unfitting and altogether unmeet for you to
require them that may command.
Which best describes a difference in the types of rhetorical appeals used by Queen Elizabeth in these excerpts from her
Address to the Troops at Tilbury and Response to Parliament's Request That She Marry?
When speaking to her troops, Queen Elizabeth appeals to logos to convince the troops of her capabilities as a leader. When
speaking to Parliament, Queen Elizabeth appeals to pathos to make members feel ashamed of their request.
When speaking to her troops, Queen Elizabeth appeals to pathos to convince the troops of her capabilities as a leader. When
speaking to Parliament, Queen Elizabeth appeals to logos to make members feel ashamed of their readest.
When speaking to her troops, Queen Elizabeth appeals to logos to inspire and encourage her army. When speaking to
Parliament, Queen Elizabeth appeals to pathos to provide rational explanations that convince lawmakers.
When speaking to her troops, Queen Elizabeth appeals to pathos to inspire and encourage her army. When speaking to
Parliament, Queen Elizabeth appeals to logos to provide rational explanations that convince lawmakers.
Mark this and return
Save and Exit
Next
Submit

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on English

question
English, 22.06.2019 06:30
Both wiesel’s all rivers run to the sea and spiegelman’s maus relate events of the holocaust from a jewish survivor’s perspective. using the third-person point of view. by retelling the experiences of friends. through the eyes of their fathers.
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 08:00
Who is generally considered a postmodern author
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 10:30
Read the excerpt from "object lesson, part 2." "no sign of the original envelope? " "no." "i found two boys with bills — in each case a single, too. david strager and joey buell. no envelope." louise's brows met. ellery glanced up at the clock. 9: 07. he strolled over to her. "don't show them you're worried. there's nothing to worry about. we have twenty-eight minutes." he raised his voice, smiling. which statement explains the inference ellery makes and why he makes it? he infers that miss carpenter thinks they are not going to find the thief because he sees her facial expression. he infers that it will take twenty-eight more minutes to find the missing money because that is all the time he has. he infers that the original envelope will not be found because neither david strager nor joey buell has it. he infers that david strager and joey buell took the money because they each have a dollar bill.
Answers: 3
question
English, 22.06.2019 12:00
What does jack london mean when he wrote "to build a fire"
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Come amongst you, as you see, at this
time, not for my recreation and disport,
but being...
Questions
question
Social Studies, 10.12.2020 21:00
question
Mathematics, 10.12.2020 21:00
question
Mathematics, 10.12.2020 21:00
question
Arts, 10.12.2020 21:00
question
Mathematics, 10.12.2020 21:00
Questions on the website: 13722363