Although this bottle is labeled "vinegar," no fizzing occurred when some of the liquid in it was added to powder from this box labeled "baking soda." But when an acidic liquid such as vinegar is added to baking soda the resulting mixture fizzes, so this bottle clearly has been mislabeled.
A flaw in the reasoning in the argument above is that this argument:
(A) ignores the possibility that the bottle contained an acidic liquid other than vinegar.
(B) fails to exclude an alternative explanation for the observed effect.
(C) depends on the use of the imprecise term "fizz".
(D) does not take into account the fact that scientific principles can be definitively tested only under controlled laboratory conditions.
(E) assumes that the fact of labeling error is proof of an intention to deceive.

c

Explanation:

because it could be bubbling but it looks like fizzing

aye how much for a gram of crack my homie jeremy needs it he is a horn dog.

hello, never fear the humanspider is here!

answer: this is what i could find because i never done this work before.

it's likely the answer would be c.

- a - you could speak slowly, but if you used the same humor and a higher complexity or the same level of complexity, they might understand what to do.

- b - the humor presented might not be understandable to the 1st graders.

- d - explaining where peanut butter comes from is irrelevant to the homeeco class.

**c - by adjusting the level of complexity, you are going to a point of talking where everybody understands you, if you what i'm saying.**

note: if you loved this answer click that cool mark brainliest button buddy!

~

your friendly neighborhood human spider.