A PEEEL Paragraph that opposes the wearing of school uniforms

One of the main arguments against wearing school uniforms is that students will lose their identity, individualism, and self-expression if they are made to wear the same clothes as everyone else.

People express themselves through their choice of clothing.

What’s wrong with studying without having to wear school uniforms?

They come up with their own style which have their own personal touch based on their taste and preferences. Some like to wear pants while others might prefer skirts and so on and so forth.

It is through clothing that people are able to show who they are while also being able to showcase and display their creativity and how they are their own unique person.

Many also argue that buying uniforms is an added expense especially to families that can’t afford them. There are families who would much rather that their kids be able to go to school wearing clothes that they already own.

Some would prefer to just give their children hand-me-downs or second-hand clothing especially if they have older kids. But they can’t do that if students have to wear school uniforms.

School uniforms are added expenses that are completely unnecessary and useless. Why? It’s because children already have clothes to wear. Why can’t they wear these outfits (as long as said outfits are appropriate) to school? Some families simply do not have the budget to spare for dresses that will only be used for school.

Furthermore, there’s the fact that children only wear school uniforms when they’re in school. As such, you would still need to spend money purchasing clothes to wear for other occasions and places.

Besides, having to wear this kind of outfit wouldn’t stop kids from asking their parents to buy them designer branded clothing for the weekends and non-school days. All of this would just add to all the other expenses that the family has to shoulder.

There are some people who argue that those who wear school uniforms would perform better in school because, considering what they’re wearing, they will be of the mindset that it is time to study and learn and not play around.

However, it can be counter-argued that school uniforms are nothing but pieces of clothing and how could this make one perform better in school? What difference does it make if you wear a certain type of clothing or not?

To study or not to study, that is the question

In the end, it’s up to students if they will decide to study and pay attention to their lessons regardless of what kind of outfit they’re wearing.

Furthermore, it can even be argued that kids who feel comfortable and who actually like the clothes that they’re wearing would be able to focus more on their studies because they won’t be busy trying to make their school uniform more comfortable for them.

Those who agree that children should wear school uniforms reason that this kind of outfit actually helps to bridge the gap between the rich and the poor.

If everyone wears the same thing, there would be no teasing or making fun of those that can’t afford expensive designer brand clothing or those that are said to have no fashion sense.

However, who’s to say that wearing school uniforms really solves that problem? Those who can’t afford to buy new uniforms would just buy second-hand ones.

If they have other children that have already graduated from the school, their outfits would be passed down to their siblings. There are also those who would have school uniforms made using cheaper cloth to lessen the expenses.

In short, there will still be a rift between the rich and the poor because students will be able to tell if someone’s uniform is old or brand new by how faded said outfit looks like.

Do you think making students wear uniforms will really help bridge the gap between the rich and poor children in school? Wouldn’t it be more likely that nothing at all would change?

Those who don’t have the budget will choose to buy cheaper uniforms while some may even resort to wearing hand-me-downs from older siblings that have already graduated, so their outfits will look old.

The point is there are still ways to show the gap between the rich and poor even if everyone is made to wear school uniforms.

Many, if not all, children don’t like rules or being told what to do and they tend to rebel against doing things they don’t want to do.

Some might try to lengthen or shorten their outfits and do other alterations to it. Some might opt to wear outrageous accessories and jewelries in order to differentiate themselves from all the others who wear the same clothes as they do.

There are those who argue that wearing school uniforms can prevent the bullying and teasing of children. Those who like to bully others will find their own reasons to engage in the act of bullying.

These are just some of the many reasons why some people are against having children wear school uniforms.This appears to be a debate that wouldn’t be resolved anytime soon.

Explanation:

what: when quoting a source, use the author’s words verbatim, or word-for-word. this means you shouldn’t change any grammar, punctuation, spelling, etc. put quotations around the words to tell your reader where the quote begins and where it ends.

you also need to acknowledge the author. for example, if using mla format for your research paper, you should have in-text citations with the author’s name and page number listed at the end of each quote.

when: use quotations to provide concrete examples to support your claims. using direct quotations is a great way to build your credibility on the subject. it’s also a good idea to quote your source when the author states things in a powerful way. if you think he or she said it best, then use the exact words to share the ideas.

example: in the short story “a jury of her peers”, mrs. hale compares mrs. wright to her caged bird, saying “she—come to think of it, she was kind of like a bird herself. real sweet and pretty, but kind of timid and—fluttery. how—she—did—change” (glaspell).

paraphrasing

what: paraphrasing differs from quoting because you restate the passage in your own words. since you don’t use the author’s words, you don’t need to use quotation marks. however, you still need to acknowledge the author for his or her ideas.

when paraphrasing a text, you should communicate the full meaning of the text; don’t change the meaning. it can be a condensed version of the text, or it could end up being longer than the source it’s paraphrasing.

when: you use paraphrasing when you take notes, or explain a chart or diagram to someone. paraphrasing highlight the important parts of a larger text. it also allows you to simplify the ideas for your readers.

example:

original: “it was no ordinary thing that called her away–it was probably further from ordinary than anything that had ever happened in dickson county. but what her eye took in was that her kitchen was in no shape for leaving: her bread all ready for mixing, half the flour sifted and half unsifted” (glaspell).

paraphrase: as mrs. hales walks around mrs. wright’s home, she notices that the kitchen is in disarray as if she was in the middle of baking bread (glaspell).

yo it cool and all : )

explanation: