How did listening to a subject talk about the dilemma allow Kohlberg to determine a person’s level of moral reasoning?

A
Kohlberg could determine if they were more concerned with looking good than doing good.
B
Kohlberg could understand how people decided what was the right thing to do.
C
Kohlberg could understand if being truthful in their reply was important or not.
D
Kohlberg could decide if they picked the right answer and give them a score.

What was the main reason for truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb on japan? to shorten the war to punish japan to save american lives the answer is c!

Read this passage from "the city without us" by alan weisman: which statement best explains how the structure of the passage supports the author's purpose? a. the passage traces several events in the order that they will occur to highlight how nature conquers human civilization. b. the passage shows that natural forces such as an absence of predators and an increase in the squirrel population can lead to destructive results. c. the passage shows that natural forms such as an absence of predators and human hunters can lead to the reforestation of new york city. d. the passage identifies how two natural forces are co-dependent - the deforestation of new york and the extinction of squirrels.

Contrast the ways that frederick douglass and satchel paige to achieve positive changes for african americans.