What internal conflict is revealed in this passage?
The narrator is confused by his decision to join the
revolution.
Highlight details in this passage that point to the conflict.
Confound the hour he entered my shop! I am a
revolutionary but not a murderer. And it would be so easy
to kill him. He deserves it. Or does he? No! No one
deserves the sacrifice others make in becoming assassins.
What is to be gained by it? Nothing. Others and still
others keep coming, and the first kill the second, and
then these kill the next, and so on until everything
til everything
becomes a sea of blood.
- "Lather and Nothing Else,"
Hernando Tellez
The narrator struggles between acting courageous
or fearful.
The narrator struggles between duty and his
personal sense of right and wrong.
The narrator is conflicted by his feeling of
compassion for the customer.
Dane
Intro

Avenn diagram would be best to take notes on which of the following informational passages? a).pet ownership improves life. b).active reading improves test scores. c).will weights or walking keep you fit? d).the day before mount ruapehu erupted.

Acomplex sentence contains . one subject and one verb

Read the passage from a vindication of the rights of woman. that the society is formed in the wisest manner, whose constitution is founded on the nature of man, strikes, in the abstract, every thinking being so forcibly, that it looks like presumption to endeavour to bring forward proofs; though proof must be brought, or the strong hold of prescription will never be forced by reason; yet to urge prescription as an argument to justify the depriving men (or women) of their natural rights, is one of the absurd sophisms which daily insult common sense. does wollstonecraft maintain an objective tone in the passage? yes, because she uses objective language such as “society is formed in the wisest manner.” yes, because she uses objective language such as “it looks like presumption to endeavor.” no, because she uses subjective language such as “though proof must be brought, or the strong hold.” no, because she uses subjective language such as “absurd sophisms which daily insult common sense.”