O'Brien says that the rule of the party is forever. However, the appendix appears to be written in a future time when there is no party. Is this a contradiction in the book?

Explanation:

Yes it is a contraction in the book because it was written when there was no party. If O'Brain had written it when party was in existence it would not have been a contradiction but because it was written prior to the existence of party it is a contractions in the book.

The party that was later held was for a purpose and it is to seek power.

to avoid unnecessary repetition, not every chapter has a map exercise attached. write a one or two-sentence answer explaining the significance of the items 7, ¶ 3-4 - civilization began in the fertile crescent because villages needed careful “in an epic tale told not long after his reign, we find gilgamesh claiming

answer: a lonely woodcutter comes by and decides to chop down the tree, while chopping, connor murphy took a nap next to the tree. waking up from the sound of chopping, he notices the tree falling on him. unable to escape, connor get hit and dies. this was the last of him.