What are Haimon's arguments that he presents to tell Creon he's making a mistake about his judgment of Antigone?

The dialogue between Haemon and Creon reveals Creon's strengths and flaws as a leader. His main strength is that he is concerned with justice and fairness. In his reaction to Haemon, he emphasizes that the good and just ruler should not favor his own family but apply justice impartially to all people.

The main weaknesses Creon reveals about his own character are authoritarianism and too high an opinion of his own rectitude. He reacts to Haemon's criticism not by listening carefully to what Haemon is saying but by emphasizing how the father must have authority over the son and the ruler over his subjects.

Explanation:

the correct answer will be d or c for me it may be different

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)