Paragraph III (8 errors; 1 point each) An attractive aspect of using word processing programs the variety of font and colors it provides. Achieving the same results by hand is nearly impossible. Markers and Inks tend to be messy if one does not know now to use they properly. Furthermore, different fonts would require knowledge of calligraphy or the use of molds. Technology offers the convenience that handwriting lacks. As a result; more people are choosing to use computers instead of writing by hand.

An attractive aspect of using word processing programs is the variety of fonts and colors they provide. Achieving the same results by hand is nearly impossible. Markers and inks tend to be messy if one does not know how to use them properly. Furthermore, different fonts would require knowledge of calligraphy or the use of molds. Technology offers the convenience that handwriting lacks. As a result, more people are choosing to use computers instead of writing by hand.

Explanation:

The first error is the verb that is missing to indicate the qualities of word processing programs. The second error is that the word font should be in plural because we are referring to the range of fonts as same as the colors that the programs offer. The third error is the word -it-, this "it" is referring to processing programs, as they are plural, the subject should be they and as the subject has changed, the verb has changed too, now is conjugated differently. The fifth error is the capital letter in the word ink, this word is not a proper noun or is not at the beginning of a sentence, so it should be inks, not Inks. The sixth error is the word now, the word that should be there according to the context and structure is -how-. The next mistake is the word they, the personal pronoun here should be them because we are referring to an object, not a subject. The last mistake is that after -as a result- there should be a comma instead of a semicolon since we use semicolons to connect two sentences. In this case, there are not two sentences, so we have to use a comma to make a pause and to introduce the next part of the sentence.    

paine is arguying that they had tried everything before coming to the conclusion that they needed to fight for their freedom.

argument: "every quiet method for peace hath been ineffectual."

claim 1: "our prayers have been rejected with disdain; and only tended to convince us, that nothing flatters vanity, or confirms obstinacy in kings more than repeated petitioning and nothing hath contributed more than that very measure to make the kings of europe absolute."

claim 2: "wherefore, since nothing but blows will do, for god’s sake, let us come to a final separation, and not leave the next generation to be cutting throats, under the violated unmeaning names of parent and child."

is this the question?