In 3–5 complete sentences, thoroughly explain how the protagonist in your Module One short story handles the conflict he or she faces? What actions or choices does the protagonist make because of the conflict? What is the outcome of the conflict? Provide at least two specific details from the text to support your analysis of how the protagonist deals with the conflict.

"Condensed Milk" is a short tale with the aid of Varlam Shalamov that is part of a larger series of short tales with the aid of him: "Kolyma Tales". The quick tale narrates the activities that take area during one of the darkest instances in Russian history, Stalin´s rule, and which have an effect on the narrator of the story, who we assume, is Shalamov himself. As history says, Shalamov become a victim of Stalin´s "goulags", or forced-labor camps, and it appears that evidently he is the only telling his own tale in a single such place. The purpose for the title of the tale is because the narrator will become critically connected to canned food, but particularly condensed milk.

The conflict in "Condensed Milk" is that we see a person who has been overcome with the aid of the terrible conditions of the forced-labor camps, he is just one more of the many "robots" who no longer feel, or need something out of life; only death. At a few point, the narrator meets with an old acquaintance of him called "Shestakov", the simplest certainly one of a group of fellows who changed into in a position to advantage an excellent role with the new regime and be benefitted through it. All the others had been now prisoners.

Shestakov proposes the narrator to break out with him from the camp, however the narrator realizes Shestakov´s intentions, which are not good. So first of all he accepts the provide of escape, tells Shestakov that in an effort to escape he wishes food, and he receives cans of condensed milk, that is his preferred form of food. However, right at the stop, guessing the genuine intentions the alternative man has, he refuses to get away.

In the quit, the narrator proves himself proper whilst he guessed that Shestakov wanted to set up a trap for they all in his preference to live on and show himself worth to the regime. He betrays the guys who believed in him and that they all quit simply as the narrator had expected they would. The narrator, on the other hand, survives and goes on to satisfy with Shestakov at some other site some time later. However, Shestakov acts as though he had never visible the narrator before in his life.

u could type them in google docs or look up flash card so that way u won have to do all that

that his long years of service outweigh any faults he may have had.

he wanted to be remembered for the good things he did, one of those being when he gave up office so others would follow suit, but george washington wasn’t a man who thought he was perfect, he knew he made mistakes. he was a very talented soldier with a natural gift of tactic.