Part A: what was the scarcer resource in the video?? PartB:

What are three uses for this scarce resource??

PartC: what examples can you give from the video that show how México city residents are adapting to water scarcity?

Part D: If you were an adviser to the Mexican government, what would you suggest to alleviate the water problem??

PartE: Think about scarcity. What scarce resources might prevent the Mexican government from implementing your suggestions???

Self-Evaluation

How did you do? Rate your work on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 as the highest score. Then write a brief evaluation of your work below. Note what you learned and what challenged you.

Can someone help me with this problem please it’s really hard for me the subject is economic please??

Part A: According to a different source, this video shows how water is an extremely scarce resource in Mexico City. This poses a variety of problems for its citizens.

Part B: Water can have several important uses. It is used for irrigation of crops. It is also used for drinking and for household tasks such as cleaning, washing and cooking.

Part C: Some of the city's residents have become activists in order to deal with the problem of water scarcity. Others buy bottled water to deal with the shortage, while others organize their lives around the availability or the lack of water.

Part D: One of the strategies I would suggest would be fixing the leaks in the water system, which would ensure that all treated water reaches its destination. I would also suggest educating the population on the importance of water and the strategies they can follow to have clean water for longer.

Part E: The main resource that would stop my plans from being implemented would be money. Money can be scarce in Mexico, and this can make it difficult to implement solutions such as fixing a leaking system or starting education campaigns.

answer: the first one

explanation:

explicitly is defined as “in a clear and detailed manner, leaving no room for confusion or doubt.” the rest are interpretive and not clearly proven leaving in fact possible “confusion or doubt” which explicitly, by definition cannot have.

you need need more details so we can understand what your asking us.