Describe how Judith Butler differs from the phenomenological feminism explicated by Simone de Beauvoir. Include in your answer why Butler maintains it is dangerous for feminists to rely on or promote the idea of “women” as a universal category and compare and contrast it to Barbara Fields’ notion of race as an ideology.

Answer and Explanation:

Judith Butlers argues that gender is created by the act of your performance. The performance is already constituted, and it is being performed through the individual acts of the body. She further elaborates on the idea that we are obliged to consider the binary gender system. She proposes that gender identity is constructed through acts. There should be a space to construct different gender based on individual acts. We are confined in our bodies, and people have to Act to move in society.

Butlers argue that performing a gender itself creates a gender. Butlers critique the terms Sex and Gender, which are being used by feminists. She argues that it is dangerous to make a group of Women describing its particular characteristics. So she is of the view that feminists should not use the term Women. The main agenda of her to create a society that should be “flexible, free-floating and not caused by other stable factors.”

In her essay, Second Sex, Beauvoir defines that women are considered as second sex because they are defined as a relation to men. She argues about the St. Thomas, who referred women as an imperfect man. She suggests that women are being considered others in a society, which is an excuse for men not to understand women and their problems.

She talks about the hierarchy in the society like race, class, and religion in the same way gender is being categorized to give rise to the patriarchal system.

source text: from the sketch here given it will be seen, that our good grandmothers differed considerably in their ideas of a fine figure, from their scantily dressed descendants of the present day. a fine lady, in those times, waddled under more clothes even on a fair summer's day, than would have clad the whole bevy of a modern ball room. nor were they the less admired by the gentlemen in consequence thereof. on the contrary, the greatness of a lover's passion seemed to increase in proportion to the magnitude of its object—and a voluminous damsel, arrayed in a dozen of petticoats, was declared by a low-dutch sonnetteer of the province, to be radiant as a sunflower, and luxuriant as a full blown cabbage. certain it is, that in those days, the heart of a lover could not contain more than one lady at a time; whereas the heart of a modern gallant has often room enough to accommodate half a dozen - - the reason of which i conclude to be, either that the hearts of the gentlemen have grown larger, or the persons of the ladies smaller — this however is a question for physiologists to determine. add punctuation to the following excerpt. writing under the name of diedrich knickerbocker washington irving aimed his potent satire at as diverse topics as political rivals such as thomas jefferson to the very ideal of looking back on the past affectionately: a fine lady, in those times, waddled under more clothes even on a fair summer's day, than would have clad the whole bevy of a modern ball room. a voluminous damsel, arrayed in a dozen of petticoats, was declared by a low-dutch sonnetteer of the province, to be radiant as a sunflower, and luxuriant as a full blown cabbage. in those days, the heart of a lover could not contain more than one lady at a time; whereas the heart of a modern gallant has often room enough to accommodate half a dozen

i am confused, i do not see a speech unless you mean the

question