Younique is writing an essay in favor of recycling to reduce garbage in the ocean. Which piece of evidence is least relevant to her argument? 1. Litter is not only ugly, but also harmful to animals in national parks
2. Millions of plastic water bottles end up in the ocean each year, adding to the millions already there and not decomposing.
3. Recycling has become easier with many public places including recycling bins right next to all garbage cans.
4. Plastic that hasn’t been recycled has extremely harmful effects to the wildlife that live in the ocean.

1. Litter is not only ugly, but also harmful to animals in national parks

Explanation:

When writing an essay in support of a point, you have to select salient points that are consistent and relatable to what you're writing about..

Younique is writing an essay in support of recycling to reduce garbage in the ocean and therefore she has to bring points that relates to side effects of throwing garbage in the ocean, how easy it is to recycle garbage and other necessary points.

The truly odd one out is option A which says "Litter is not only ugly, but also harmful to animals in national parks".

This has no direct connection to effect of garbage in the ocean or recycling so this is the piece of evidence with the least relevance to her argument.

the legal limit for the drivers who can drive after consuming any amount of alcohol is 21 years.

explanation:

on november 1, 1996, a "zero tolerance law" was put into effect in the new york state.

according to this zero tolerance law, for people under the age of 21 years, it was illegal to purchase and possess alcohol or to drive after consuming any amount of it.

also, the alcohol involvement rate for the drivers under the age of 21 was roughly twice that of elderly drivers.

there is no sentence to look at.