Select the example that would make the best evidence for challenging the aphorism: No gains without pains.

A. Some people are born into circumstances that make life easy and good for them.

B. A friend gets a job after going to school, training, and interviewing 15 times.

C. Regular, vigorous exercise and healthy food choices lead to lasting weight loss.

D. A team wins the championship game after practicing an extra two hours each day.

D.

Explanation:

An aphorism is a short statement that reflects wit and delivers a message or moral principle. An aphorism is identified by its length or use of number of words in the statement and the true value it consists.

For example, 'Action speaks louder than words' is an aphorism which conveys the meaning that even if there is lack of words, the action of a person says it all about the person.

'No gains without pains' is an aphorism which conveys the meaning that good fruits are produced in burying; there is no result without working hard for it.

The evidence that challenges this aphorism is in option D. The option clearly exemplifies that the team practiced extra two hours daily (hard-work) which produced the result of the team winning.

So, the correct answer is option D.

elise is writing a literary analysis of a biographical essay about emily dickinson.

which of the following should elise use in order to provide a strong claim statement in the introduction to her analysis?

a.  

“a life apart” by julia golding maintains that emily dickenson wrote over a thousand poems during her life.

that is the way of a cheater and cheaters get nothing but bad grades and in trouble.