Which response best explains how author Mark O’Mara aims to improve society in the article "Gun Debate? What Gun Debate?" A-O’Mara presents new evidence about the usefulness of guns in society in order to help gun advocates and opponents find a measure of common ground.

B-O’Mara shows the strengths of both sides of the American gun debate to help gun advocates and opponents find a measure of common ground.

C-O’Mara reviews the arguments of gun-rights advocates in depth in order to use emotional appeals to persuade the audience of the devastation of gun violence.

D-O’Mara puts statistics about gun deaths in a new light in order to shock readers into acknowledging the devastation of gun violence.

D-O’Mara puts statistics about gun deaths in a new light in order to shock readers into acknowledging the devastation of gun violence.

Explanation:

From the article, "Gun Debate? What Gun Debate?", Mark O'Mara makes an argument about the gun problem in America. He believes that while gun-rights advocates argue that gun control would be an infringement on their rights to self-defense as enshrined in the Second Amendment, they have ignored the fact that there have been quite a number of gun-related deaths, more especially in schools.

He brings the statistic of the number of gun-related deaths each year which according to him is at 300,000 deaths per year and putting it in perspective, America lost 60,000 soldiers in the Vietnam war.

is this a question or a comment