Question 1(Multiple Choice Worth 4 points) Which word represents the subject of this sentence? "Because contrary to the wisdom of the bumper sticker, it is not enough these days to simply QUESTION AUTHORITY." it wisdom days authority Question 2(Multiple Choice Worth 4 points) Which statement below is true of the following lines of poetry from "Totally like whatever, you know?" "I entreat you, I implore you, I exhort you, I challenge you: To speak with conviction." The syntax used in these lines makes fun of the speaker and reader. The syntax used in these lines has no effect on the speaker or reader. The syntax used in these lines reflects the argument of the speaker. The syntax used in these lines opposes the argument of the speaker. Question 3(Multiple Choice Worth 4 points) This line of poetry from "Totally like whatever, you know?" is most likely stated as a question for what purpose? "I have nothing personally invested in my own opinions, okay?" To show that questions can be formed in any situation To explain the speaker's uncertainty To mock the manner of speaking that the writer is criticizing To show that the speaker does not know how to use punctuation Question 4(Multiple Choice Worth 4 points) Which line from "Totally like whatever, you know?" represents the poet's ability to apply proper use of syntax? Even when those sentences aren't, like, questions? You know? That we've just gotten to the point where it's just, like . . .whatever! Where are the limbs out on which we once walked? Have they been, like, chopped down with the rest of the rainforest? Question 5(Multiple Choice Worth 4 points) What is the purpose of the dashes in this excerpt from "Totally like whatever, you know?" "Declarative sentences—so--called because they used to, like, DECLARE things to be true, okay, as opposed to other things are, like, totally, you know, not— have been infected by a totally hip and tragically cool interrogative tone?" To maintain the normal flow of ideas To support the author's purpose of maintaining normal flow of ideas To disrupt the normal flow of ideas To explain the normal flow of ideas