Rephrase the following sentences: Each correct answer is worth 1 point
1. Sorry, you can’t park your car here.
… …………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………….

2. Would you mind showing me around?
…………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………

3. I can’t wait to meet your family.
…………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………….

4. New Zealand is not as big as Australia.

…………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………
5. He gave me a piece of advice.
…………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………

1. You cant park your car here, sorry.

2. Would you show me around?

3. I'm excited to meet your family.

4. New Zealand is smaller than Australia.

5. He gave me some advice.

Explanation:

faulty parallelism is a construction in which two or more parts of a sentence are equivalent in meaning but not grammatically similar in form.

the correct version of this faulty parallelism in the sentence is:

the hikers knew that the hike was six miles, that it usually required the entire day, and it would not be wise to start after 10: 00 a.m.

the problem is the last sentence, the first two have a basic subject+verb+object structure.

so, to give a proper balance to the structure, or better said, to give a parallel structure, we must write a basic s+v+o structure in all three sentences:

the hikers knew that the hike was six miles, that it usually required the entire day, and it would not be wise to start after 10: 00 a.m.

i think the answer is restaurants offering only dinner