subject
English, 29.08.2020 07:01 drxppymami

In an interview, Faulkner described the conflict of Miss Emily: she “had broken all the laws of her tradition, her background, and she had finally broken the law of God too… And she knew she was doing wrong, and that’s why her own life was wrecked.” According to New Criticism, authorial intent is irrelevant, that only what is in the text is applicable, so just because Faulkner himself said this about his own piece doesn’t make it correct. Do you agree or disagree with his interpretation? Why or Why not?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on English

question
English, 22.06.2019 03:30
Aman lives on the twelfth floor of an apartment building. every morning he takes the elevator down to the lobby and leaves the building. in the evening, he gets into the elevator, and, if there is someone else in the elevator -- or if it was raining that day -- he goes back to his floor directly. otherwise, he goes to the tenth floor and walks up two flights of stairs to his apartment.
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 06:00
If you were making a persuasive speech about how students should take creative writing every year they are in school, which sentence would most effectively support that argument?
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 09:30
The women are often described through stage directions rather than through dialogue. how does this reinforce the role of women in glaspell’s time? how does it go against the role of women?
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 10:30
How did mlk jr.’s “voice” in his speeches shape the civil rights movement
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
In an interview, Faulkner described the conflict of Miss Emily: she “had broken all the laws of her...
Questions
question
World Languages, 05.07.2019 23:30
Questions on the website: 13722367