PLZ ANSWER FAST 15 POINTS! So my claim is "People who post inappropriate and immature posts on social media should have consequences and, they should not be able to get away with it and see it as an “okay thing to do.” And the question I am asking is, "What would the other side say to your claim? Use the information you have gathered from research to write the counterclaim in a single sentence.

Hey there!

Maybe you could write: "Some of the consequences may prevent people from wanting to use social media, and this would cause a general decrease in social media users."

But this is a pretty strong claim and there isn't much to argue against it. It would be easier if you edited your claim, so it would be easier to argue against it.

Let me know if this helps :)

the sentence does not violate the phrase structure second rule (introduced by noam chomsky) because noun phrases consist of a determiner such as a, the or every, and a noun. in the sentence, the noun phrase the cake includes a determiner (the) and a noun (cake).

on the other hand, the first rule indicates that a sentence encloses a noun phrase, followed by a verb phrase. the example sentence can be analysed as follows:

john (n) + ate (v) + the (det) + cake (n).

alliteration is the repetition of the same or similar consonants. having that in mind, i would say that the correct answer is: so shows a snowy dove trooping with crows.