Which statement is not a reason that shakespeare may have written the tragedy of julius caesar for the elizabethan audience?
shakespeare wanted to illustrate that elizabeth i and julius caesar had nothing in common.

shakespeare wanted to show the ways that a successful authority could be toppled by the people.

shakespeare wanted to make fun of a society that was also divided by status.

shakespeare wanted to create controversy by showing the issues that might be caused by england’s increasing power.

Shakespeare wanted to show the ways that a successful authority could be toppled by the people.

It is unlikely that Shakespeare wrote this play in order to show the ways in which a successful authority could be toppled by the people. However, the other options are likely to be true. It is possible that Shakespeare wanted to show that Elizabeth I and Julius Caesar had nothing in common, as well as the fact that England's increasing power could lead them to have the same issues. Finally, it is possible that Shakespeare wanted to make fun of a society that was divided by status.

both the address and the poster use diction to convey their message. diction is defined as a style of writing or speaking based on the types of words chosen in order to send a message. parallelism is when a similar sentence structure is used for several sentences on a text; roosevelt's address doesn't follow that. repetition has to do with repeating a word or sentence in order to emphasize and idea, however neither the poster nor the address use repetion. finally, the address doesn't use images to convey a message.

you can infer that to folke dude was spying for allied nations