which character in the story is most clearly the foil sanchez, defense lawyer, had wanted her client to plead guilty. her client, holmes, probably wasn't guilty, but the prosecutor was going to use so many shady tactics to make him look guilty plea, holmes would at least get a lighter sentece. but but there was was no use arguing with him anymore. holmes had insited. "even if they lock me up for years," he had said, "i will never admit to that to that crime." holmes was a diffcult man to work with, but sanchez admired his sense of honor. the judge banged her gavel and asked, "how do you plead?" sanchez took a deep breath. "not guilty, your honor," she said. and so the trial began

explanation:

it refers to the definition of full-contact sports, where the condition is that the sport must have athletes must "purposely collide with each other

waves come crashing to grey sullen shores.

powerful and strong, it breathes and roars.

cascading and caressing each grain of sand,

a warm embrace between sea and land.

high above, a seagull soars high.

wings of purity it spreads to fly.

battling high against darkened cloud,

in a wind that blows fiercely, flying graceful and proud.

beneath, the sand is soft and warm.

sculpted by nature, it's weathered the storm.

a passionate battle between calmness and rage,

a new chapter's beginning; don't turn the last page.

i listen again to the whispering waves,

music of nature calming and brave.

its power unknown, its stillness untamed,

mysterious and magical, a treasure earth claims.

plz mark brainliest

explanation:

a

explanation:

answer: it is true that students often work and do household chores, but managing homework in addition to other responsibilities students learn to organize their time efficiently and prioritize their studies.

the first argument attacks those who disagree, asking them to be "realistic" and "accept facts." this is not conducive to healthy debate and disagreement. the second one only takes into account a section of the student population, and ignores the other one. finally, the third option offers only anecdotal evidence. it is only the last option that provides a well-constructed argument in a persuasive way.