Last week, Coach Turner, my cricket coach, asked me to consider playing fricket (the name is a combination of "Frisbee" and "cricket"). He wants the most talented cricket players in school to form a new fricket team. Today, I attended my first fricket game, and I finally understand why the coach wants me to play. Fricket is similar in many ways to the game of cricket, but it is played with a flying disc rather than a ball. Team members try to throw a disc at the opposing team's wickets—which are wooden or metal rectangles placed in the ground with empty cups on top. The goal is to throw the disc between the opposing team's wickets without knocking over the cups.
After the game, Coach Turner and I brainstormed about starting a fricket team at our school. I know of at least seven of my fellow cricket players who might be interested in learning more about the game. A fricket team requires only four players, so our prospect of finding enough players is looking bright. My next step will be to take the interested students to a fricket game. I know from personal experience that they will quickly be hooked on this exciting game!
7
What can the reader infer about fricket from this passage?
A.
Fricket requires many of the same skills that cricket does.
B.
Fricket is quickly replacing cricket as a popular school sport.
C.
Fricket is a game that results in many injuries to students.
D.
Fricket teams will only recruit players from local high schools.
Reset Submit

a and b are the correct answer to what your looking fior

explanation:

the intellectual community is a place like a university where people with high marks, or original thought or an outstanding interest in something gather. they take classes together. they discuss things. they argue sometimes, and not always in a friendly way. but if they argue, it is because they are passionate about something, and there is nothing the matter with that.

lately i've been hearing rumors that it is not the way it was when i went to school. the one thing all schools used to have was free speech. the 1st amendment rights were sacred. now i'm hearing they are not. students can be reported and disciplined for giving an off the wall opinion.

that is shameful.

intellectual ideas are meant to be discussed. they are meant to be chewed up and worked on. that is the primary responsibility of every intellectual community. if that is not the way it is, then that is not a school to go to.

social media, in my opinion, and this is just an opinion. i wouldn't take it too seriously, complicates everything to do with human communication. you can want to share things and others feel they have the right to be very critical or sarcastic or mean about what you share. lack of respect is an immeasurable intolerable condition and social media abounds with that sort of thing.

one of the things i really like about is how careful people are because they must have some idea that the mods are exactly what the word says they are. they police this board very well, and what is so remarkable about them is that they are no older than the average grade 12 student.

my hat goes off to them (which means i respect them quite a bit).

nature versus humanity!

the answer is fantasy