Do you think Clinton’s speech was affected and showing support for the American people during the tragedy? How does his use of language and parallelism help advance his purpose

I inferred this to be the clearer question;

Do you think Clinton’s speech was effective in showing support for the American people during this tragedy? How does his use of language and parallelism help to advance his purpose? Explain, citing text evidence in your response.

Yes

Explanation:

In that speech, President Clinton expressed in the best possible terms the pain he felt for those who lost loved ones because of the tragedy.

For instance, during hise speech , Clinton read a message from a woman who lost her husband in a terrorist bombing, in her words she urged Americans not to be “consumed” by anger, but to “search for justice.”

a

explanation:

because i the point in view is between characters