What is the main difference in viewpoint described in the passage about Douglass learning to read?
That which to him was a great evil, to be carefully
shunned, was to me a great good, to be diligently sought;
and the argument which he so warmly urged, against my
learning to read, only served to inspire me with a desire
and determination to learn. In learning to read, I owe
almost as much to the bitter opposition of my master, as
to the kindly aid of my mistress. I acknowledge the
benefit of both.

-Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass,
Frederick Douglass

1 Mr. Auld thought Douglass should wait to learn to
read.

2 Douglass thought he never would have learned to
read without the support of his Mr. Auld.

3 To Douglass, his learning to read was of great
value; to Mr. Auld, it was dangerous.

4 Mr. Auld didn't want Douglass to learn to read, but
Mrs. Auld did

Answer Choice C is correct.

to Douglas his learning to read was great value; to Mr Auld it was dangerous

It is C...Douglas loved to learn, but Mr. Auld opposed him of learning.

Explanation:

hope it helps, and plz folow me! :)

1

abominable dr. phibes

1: 42

2

american psycho

2: 07

3

speak of the devil

1: 48

4

walk among us

1: 23

5

the hunger

1: 43

6

from hell they came

7

dig up her bones

3: 02

8

blacklight

1: 28

9

resurrection

1: 30

10

dead kings rise

3: 05

11

this island earth

2: 15

12

crimson ghost

2: 01

13

day of the dead

1: 50

14

the haunting

1: 26

15

mars attacks

2: 28

16

hate the living, love the dead

1: 37

17

shining

3: 00

18

don’t open ’til doomsday / hellnight

7: 58

i would say that it is a bad thesis because it doesn't explain what the health risks are. it seems to be a very vague thesis statement. thesis statements need to set up for the entire essay. it needs to give the reasons why people need to stop drinking diet soda.   so, i would say that it is a bad thesis.

hope this