It was the first time I (drive) a sports car. I (wait) at the bus stop for an hour when the bus came.

The children (make) a lot of noise while I (do) my work, so it was impossible to concentrate.

John (see) the movie
before, so he knew what would happen.

He always (get)
into trouble at school.

The children (play) in the garden whenever the weather was nice.

It was the first time I drove a sports car.

I waited at the bus for an hour when the bus came.

The children made a lot of noise while I did my work, so it was impossible to concentrate.

John saw the movie before, so he knew what would happen.

He would always get into trouble at school. (?)

The children played in the garden whenever the weather was nice.

no,

explanation:

because they are likely to use their corrupted thought process to get what they want. not what is better for the another reason they shouldn't is since they abused their rights as a us citizen they should have certain rights stripped away from them as punishment, such as the right to vote. due to the lack of proper behavior exemplified   from their actions , it would be hard for people to trust them because of their criminal record.   either directly (in the case of a referendum or ballot initiative) or indirectly (by choosing lawmakers and law enforcers). in fact, we do have certain minimum, objective standards of responsibility and commitment to our laws that we require people to meet before they are given a role in the solemn enterprise of self-government. people who have committed serious crimes against their fellow citizens don’t meet those standards. and those crimes can include such “non-violent felonies” as, say, treason and espionage, or voter fraud and public corruption, white-collar crime and felonies merely “concerning drugs” — like trafficking in fentanyl-laced heroin and selling it to minors, for example. if you’re not willing to follow the law, then you should not have a role in making the law for everyone else.

the simple predicate of the sentence is camped.