Which conclusion about historical significance can be drawn from this information? The emblem of the British crown was carved onto all artifacts found by the British army. The carving on the slit drum was viewed as an unimportant addition by Kitchener's army. The carving on the slit drum is representative of British rule over African territories. The emblem of the British crown was commonly found already engraved on foreign artifacts.

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.

The conclusion about the historical significance that can be drawn from this information is that symbols played a big part in the British army in that it created a sense of "possession" or a mark for power, during the imperialistic years of England. The fact that the emblem of the British crown was carved onto all artifacts found by the British army as well as other foreign artifacts, represented a way to demonstrate the power, dominion, and control of the British rule in those years of the dominant presence of the English crown in the African territories.

i think it's either 'to expose the corruption of the communists in russia', or 'to criticize animal brutality by communists in russia.'  

hope this ! : )

3

explanation: