Write a paragraph that interprets one of these sections from “A Computer Can Now Translate Languages as Well as a Human:” “We’re still good for something”
“The best part of language is its quirks”

Use textual evidence and commentary to answer these questions in your response:

What is the author saying about language and the role of a human being in translating?
What textual evidence supports this idea?
How does this evidence support the idea?

Only a human translation can tell the difference because the machine translator will just do the direct word to word translation. These human translators are soaked up in the culture and are able to pick slang and nuances in the text that machines cannot detect.

Explanation:

I dont know but this is what I think. Sorry if this is wrong.

In the section titled “We’re still good for something,” Ramirez argues that humans will still be more effective in translating certain words and phrases than a computer. The author states that “there are terms that exist in one language but not another, necessitating an explanation rather than a translation.” This means that a human may be needed to process how to explain a term that does not have an exact translation in another language.

Explanation:

its from edmentum so change it up a bit

it translates into:

read the letter of your pen pal. write and answer 3 questions.

a personal narrative essay is about a personal experience, so it is usually written in the first person. to maximize its impact, the essay should: be written to have an emotional impact on the reader. include a lot of references to sensory perceptions and hope i