In a group discussion, which response most clearly uses evidence to support a conclusion? a. i only agree with the governor that there's a problem, not with her solution. b. the governor spoke at length about the problems facing the nation's poor. c. although the governor is probably wealthy, she may not have been born rich. d. given that the governor's income is $200,000, i doubt she understands poverty.

The correct answer is D. Given that the governor's income is $200,000, I doubt she understands poverty.

Explanation:

The word "evidence" refers to any piece of information such as statistics or numerical data, reason, examples, quotes,personal experiences among others that directly prove or show a claim or statement is true or false or that is used as a support to conclude something which is useful in debates, discussions or argumentative texts. Considering this, the response that uses evidence to support a conclusion is "Given that the governor's income is $200,000, I doubt she understands poverty" because in this example the speaker is using numerical data "the governor's income is $200,000" to get to a conclusion that is directly proved by the data "I doubt she understands poverty". Also, this is the only statement that relies on evidence to state a point as other options only use statements to get to the conclusion.

idk

explanation:

what: when quoting a source, use the author’s words verbatim, or word-for-word. this means you shouldn’t change any grammar, punctuation, spelling, etc. put quotations around the words to tell your reader where the quote begins and where it ends.

you also need to acknowledge the author. for example, if using mla format for your research paper, you should have in-text citations with the author’s name and page number listed at the end of each quote.

when: use quotations to provide concrete examples to support your claims. using direct quotations is a great way to build your credibility on the subject. it’s also a good idea to quote your source when the author states things in a powerful way. if you think he or she said it best, then use the exact words to share the ideas.

example: in the short story “a jury of her peers”, mrs. hale compares mrs. wright to her caged bird, saying “she—come to think of it, she was kind of like a bird herself. real sweet and pretty, but kind of timid and—fluttery. how—she—did—change” (glaspell).

paraphrasing

what: paraphrasing differs from quoting because you restate the passage in your own words. since you don’t use the author’s words, you don’t need to use quotation marks. however, you still need to acknowledge the author for his or her ideas.

when paraphrasing a text, you should communicate the full meaning of the text; don’t change the meaning. it can be a condensed version of the text, or it could end up being longer than the source it’s paraphrasing.

when: you use paraphrasing when you take notes, or explain a chart or diagram to someone. paraphrasing highlight the important parts of a larger text. it also allows you to simplify the ideas for your readers.

example:

original: “it was no ordinary thing that called her away–it was probably further from ordinary than anything that had ever happened in dickson county. but what her eye took in was that her kitchen was in no shape for leaving: her bread all ready for mixing, half the flour sifted and half unsifted” (glaspell).

paraphrase: as mrs. hales walks around mrs. wright’s home, she notices that the kitchen is in disarray as if she was in the middle of baking bread (glaspell).