What is the counterargument in the article? A. Language should not change over time, but remain consistent for ease of communication information to others B. Using alternative forms of written communication, like emoticons, is ruining modern language C. Emoticons allow for faster communication and the ability to convey complex feelings in written communications D. Verbal communication modes are more effective for sharing important or complex information over written communication

A. Language should not change over time, but remain consistent for ease of communication information to others

Explanation:

This is the counterargument in the article. This is because, language which has been as old as man should not change overtime. For example, use of emoticons most times confuse an individual who is communicating with another person due to lack of understanding of those emoticons.

onto a large boat, and mark the water level that the boat sinks to. then, take the elephant out and put a bunch of marked weights onto the boat until it reaches the same water level. add up the masses of the weights to get the weight of the elephant.

a lot to the other person they me out big