During an interview, your subject mentions the benefits of animal-based research in medicine. You are firmly against such research and cannot understand how the subject can support it! In the interview, you should: Select one: a. Simply thank the interviewee for her time and leave. DO NOT remain in an interview that you disagree with.
b. Take advantage of the opportunity to thoroughly explain your views. Perhaps you can convince the interviewee that she's wrong.
c. Stay calm and ask your subject how she would respond to protesters who say that animal-based research is unnecessary. Give her a chance to explain her views, and respectfully listen to them.
d. Any of the above. Since there are not any guidelines to dealing with the opposite point of view in an interview, you'll have to do what you think is best!

C). Stay calm and ask your subject how she would respond to protesters who say that animal-based research is unnecessary. Give her a chance to explain her views, and respectfully listen to them.

Explanation:

In the given situation, the most ethical action would be to 'stay calm and ask your subject about your views and examine how the interviewee responds to the counterarguments which assert that animal-based research is rebundant and worthless and offer an opportunity to the speaker to elucidate her point of view and regardfully listen to them.' This would not only show ethics but also help you understand the reasoning behind her views and how she supports it that may assist in widening your existing thoughts and perceptions. Thus, option C is the correct answer.

because, you have to i : /

hope this ! =)

cutie~

hancock was president of congress when the declaration of independence was adopted and signed. he is primarily remembered by americans for his large, flamboyant signature on the declaration, so much so that "john hancock" became, in the united states, an informal synonym for signature.

explanation: