Re-read lines 25-43. How do Rusesabagina's words convey his feelings about the division between Hutus & Tustis? What is his purpose in describing his family when explaining these differences? Support your answer with explicit textual evidence.

The author of the story is Paul Rusesabagina.

In which he cannot make any difference between Hutus and Tustis, to evidence this opinion he said that.

His was the son of Tustsi, and  Hutus. He is unable to see any difference between his parents which is very normal no child can see any difference between there parents.

Rusesabagina does not understand the intolerance between the Hutus and Tutsis. Or else we can say he don't wants to understand that cause no child want there parents to be apart.

This opinion is somehow influenced by the family of  Rusesabagina

Because his father comes from the Hutus, while the mother belonged to the Tutsis so this is very natural and common the ethical division was never present in their homes.

In Rusesabagina eyes it proves that the division is not beneficial or good, but is it responsible for causing a lot of pain or can create a mental health issue the family members.

For more details :

link

This question is about "An Ordinary Man" by Paul Rusesabagina.

Rusesabagina does not see differences between Hutus and Tustis, to evidence this opinion he mentions that his father was Hutu and his mother was Tustsi, he did not see differences between his parents, so he does not see differences between these two races.

Explanation:

Rusesabagina does not understand the rivalry and intolerance between the Hutus and Tutsis. That is why he does not support the genocide that is taking place among these peoples and decides to hide many refugees so that they are not murdered. For him, this division between the two peoples is not beneficial and makes no sense.

This opinion is greatly influenced by the formation of the Rusesabagina family, because the father belonged to the Hutus, while the mother belonged to the Tutsis. this ethical division was never present in their homes, which proves that the division is not beneficial, but is responsible for causing a lot of pain and suffering.

the answer should be the first one. "many people find his lyrics very moving."

it by far makes the most grammatical sense and is very objective, removing any first person from the original sentence and keeping with the sentence fluency.