Which of the events solve the main problem? Problem: The miller needs a job and worries about people's opinion of him.

Solution 1: The miller is employed at a mill and is worried that his anti-milling family & friend(s) might disapprove with his career choice(s).

Solution 2: The anti-miller is boycotting mills with his anti-milling family, friend(s) and/or coworker(s). This demonstrates his obvious lack of care for pro-miller’s opinion(s) of him while showing the opposite to the anti-millers. Consequently, his strong opposition towards mills won’t allow him to work at one and he’s now unemployed in a coincidentally mill-dominant city.

Solution 3: The miller is employed at a mill and is therefore highly regarded by his pro-milling family/friend(s)/coworkers.

Solution 4: The closeted anti-miller has no choice but to work at a mill due to his lack of self respect and untimely need for funds. The anti-miller’s choice(s) have begun to bring him a great deal of negativity from those whom know of his hidden anti-mill views. He’s unconfident in himself now that he’s essentially living a lie. His coworkers unknowingly, and rightfully so, add to his turmoil with their pro-mill commentary.

Solution 5: Everything and anything having to do with mills and milling is wiped from existence in it’s entirety. (This solution leaves you with no mill-related problem to have ever occurred and doesn’t give chance to any mill-related problem to happen.)

uncanny would be like unlucky or disaster. you can look for more in the dictionary or if you have text book then turn to a. 17 but it's different with textbooks.

can you post the story