English, 23.10.2020 18:50 svlext

Plz help ASAP The essay is called " Will We ‘Fix’ The Weather? Yes. Should We Fix The Weather? Hmmm"

1. PART A: Which statement best identifies the central idea of the essay?

A. Human action will inescapably be required to reverse the effects of climate
change.
B. The possibility of regulating the climate poses the question of whether or not we
should.
C. Human beings will never be able to truly control every aspect of the natural
world.
D. Efforts to combat climate change are undermined by showy but unsustainable
experiments.

2. PART B: Which phrase from the text best supports the answer to Part A?

A. “The Earth will, of course, keep moving nearer and farther from the sun, our
planet will keep wobbling on its axis” (Paragraph 4)
B. “‘but there are other things we need to deal with, like consumption. They burned
$50,000 just for the helicopter.’” (Paragraph 11)
C. “there’s no guarantee geoengineers won’t make mistakes too. Technology won’t
give us a free ride.” (Paragraph 11)
D. “‘What does it mean to manufacture a planet to our liking, assuming we earned
the skill to do so?’” (Paragraph 13)

3. How does the mention of Einstein and Newton in Paragraph 5 contribute to the
development of the ideas presented in the essay?
A. It speaks to the history of climate change and efforts to combat it.
B. It demonstrates the impracticality of developing technology to control the
climate.
C. It shows that many brilliant minds already attended to the issue of climate
change.
D. It emphasizes the progress of the engineers and technology.

4. Which statement best describes how the author responds to the idea that regulating the
environment will keep humans safe and comfortable?
A. He agrees that this may be true, but expresses discomfort with the idea of
people exerting too much control over the natural world.
B. He disagrees ardently, and believes that the development of such technology
would be ineffective at best and harmful to humans at worst.
C. He agrees that it is possible and thus endorses the efforts of various scientists to
devise technologies to address climate change.
D. He suggests that no method of modulating the environment for the safety of
humans could possibly be practicable or sustainable.

4

5. How does Krulwich convey his purpose in the essay? Cite evidence from the text in your
response.

Answers: 2

Show answers

Another question on English

English, 22.06.2019 00:30

The story line remains the same. the kids live in what was then one of the remaining beachfront slums, down the coast from the expensive malibu area. the beach was ruled by surfers, but in the afternoon, when the waves died down, some of the surfers, or their younger brothers, fooled around on skateboards. one day, skip engblom, the shop owner, comes up with a key breakthrough, polyurethane wheels: "they grip." with the additional traction, the z-boys try skating the sides of the big, open drainage canal that runs through the area. then comes a brainstorm: because of a drought, the area's swimming pools were drained. the kids started "borrowing" pools when the owners weren't home, to skate the curved sides.” where did “the lords of dogtown” originally practice their tricks? a. the beach c. an open drainage canal b. empty pools d. none of these

Answers: 3

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 00:30

What phrase from "speech after being convicted of voting" most engages the audience's sense of pathos, or their emotions?

Answers: 1

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 03:00

Life is a barren field frozen with snow. what literary device is he using? a.metaphor b. simile c. personification d. none of the above

Answers: 2

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 04:50

Read the passage, then answer the question that follows. no one could have seen it at the time, but the invention of beet sugar was not just a challenge to cane. it was a hint—just a glimpse, like a twist that comes about two thirds of the way through a movie—that the end of the age of sugar was in sight. for beet sugar showed that in order to create that perfect sweetness you did not need slaves, you did not need plantations, in fact you did not even need cane. beet sugar was a foreshadowing of what we have today: the age of science, in which sweetness is a product of chemistry, not whips. in 1854 only 11 percent of world sugar production came from beets. by 1899 the percentage had risen to about 65 percent. and beet sugar was just the first challenge to cane. by 1879 chemists discovered saccharine—a laboratory-created substance that is several hundred times sweeter than natural sugar. today the sweeteners used in the foods you eat may come from corn (high-fructose corn syrup), from fruit (fructose), or directly from the lab (for example, aspartame, invented in 1965, or sucralose—splenda—created in 1976). brazil is the land that imported more africans than any other to work on sugar plantations, and in brazil the soil is still perfect for sugar. cane grows in brazil today, but not always for sugar. instead, cane is often used to create ethanol, much as corn farmers in america now convert their harvest into fuel. –sugar changed the world, marc aronson and marina budhos how does this passage support the claim that sugar was tied to the struggle for freedom? it shows that the invention of beet sugar created competition for cane sugar. it shows that technology had a role in changing how we sweeten our foods. it shows that the beet sugar trade provided jobs for formerly enslaved workers. it shows that sweeteners did not need to be the product of sugar plantations and slavery.

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

Plz help ASAP The essay is called " Will We ‘Fix’ The Weather? Yes. Should We Fix The Weather? Hmmm...

Questions