Pls help :DD PH Beowulf pp. 50 - 53
British Literature
“The Battle with Grendel’s Mother”
1. In what ways does Beowulf seem superhuman? How have previous parts of the story attempted to prepare us for this?

3. How is Beowulf’s fight with Grendel’s mother different from his fight with Grendel?

4. What 2 (apparently) supernatural aids does Beowulf receive in his battle in the underwater cave?

5. Contrast the Danes and Geats reaction when Beowulf doesn’t return immediately. What does this reveal about the two tribes?

6. What does Beowulf bring back from the watery cave? Why do you think he brings back just these items?

Discussion
Choose a passage from this section that you can use to start a discussion thread. It should be a passage that has a particular meaning or quality to discuss. Or you can include a part of the text you are unsure about or question for some reason. You can get your group to discuss the literary features, meaning, significance and more.
Copy your passage here and include the line numbers.

one of the central themes of edward abbey's work has been his staunch opposition to the glen canyon dam on the colorado river that created lake powell, destroying stunning scenery and wildlife habitat, endangering many rare species of fish and animals, and also irreparably destroying many important archaeological sites which provided information about the early inhabitants of the united states.

"character is what you are in the dark." dwight lyman moody, in this very witty quotation of his, states we act and think differently when we are "in the dark", that is, when the spotlight is not on us and everyone can see us and consequently judge us. when reading, we tend to be sympathetic to some characters and their dilemmas. by being so, we are saying to ourselves that we agree with those characters' acts and choices, even if they are morally questionable if we have common sense in mind. dwight lyman moody's quotation applies very well to "crime and punishment", by   19th century russian writer fiodor dostoyevsky. raskolnikov, the main character, a former law student who spends his days reflecting upon life and its misery, draws a fatal conclusion: mankind is divided in two main categories: ordinary and extraordinary people. the first are the ones who lead a run-of-the-mill existence and are full of imperfections; the latter are the ones who are spiritually superior, the ones who always know better, and have the right to judge the ordinary ones, as well as eliminate them if for common good. raskolnikov considers himself as belonging to the extraordinary category and decides to kill an old lady who is a money lender and in whose house he rents a small room. raskolnikov compares himself to napoleon, who had the undeniable right to execute tons of people during the war in order to save his nation. of course what the main character decides to do is a horrendous crime, but as readers we feel it is the right thing for him to do, since the victim is a mean old woman who only thinks about money and keeps humiliating her younger sister. what one experiences is a mixture of sympathy and empathy for the character, even though he decides to commit homicide, which is not at all accepted or tolerated by civilized citizens. however, since readers are "in the dark", they allow themselves to feel in ways they would probably never dare to confess to anyone, no matter how nasty or vicious a character can be. after all, they are just reading and doing no harm. in other words, readers are in the dark and can be who they are without being judged.