How is an article written 50 years after an event different from an article written one year after the event?

It can reflect on the long-term impact of the event.

It can summarize the details of the event chronologically.

It can show the immediate reactions of the people involved.

It can provide lots of specific details about the event.

It can reflect on the long-term impact of the event.

Explanation:

An article that is written so long after an event happened, is able to show the long term effects of the event because it would be able to include events that happened in the 50 years after the event in question has happened.

An article written only a year afterwards however, will be unable to talk about the long term impact of the event and will be more focused on the relatively immediate impacts of the event.

For instance, an article about the Civil Rights Act written in 1965 would be unable to talk about the long term impact of the Act as opposed to an article written in 2014 that will show such for instance how Southern States fought the Act.

i think the beatles

explanation: they are talked about more.

jungkook (if i had to pick one) but all of them rly!

explanation:

um why