Read about a recent natural disaster, such as a tornado, hurricane, tsunami, flash flood in your region, drought, or mudslide. Turn the true account into a myth. Explain the natural
disaster as if the reason behind it was a result of improper human behavior.

There are many ways to describe the wave of disasters—the hurricanes, wildfires, and droughts—that have swept across North America this summer.

You could call them unprecedented. After all, Irma and Harvey were the first two category four hurricanes to make landfall in the United States in the same year. You might call them harrowing, especially when you consider that more than six million acres of land—a million in Montana alone—have burned during this year's wildfire season. And no one paying attention to the aftermath of hurricanes Maria, Harvey, and Irma would hesitate to call those storms devastating. Puerto Rico's 3.4 million residents have struggled for more than a week with no electricity, and more than half of them still don't have clean water. And, for the first time in more than 300 years, no one is living on the Island of Barbuda; all 94,000 residents have left.

There are many ways to describe this summer’s calamities. But whatever you call these disasters, don't ever call them natural. There’s nothing “natural”—which is to say, nothing inevitable—about a disaster.

Most of what we call natural disasters (tornadoes, droughts, hurricanes) are indeed natural, though human contributions may increase their likelihood or intensity. But they aren't disasters—they're hazards. If a hurricane slams into land where no one lives, it isn't a disaster; it's weather. A disaster is when a natural hazard meets a human population. And often, that intersection is far from natural.

(This is just my opinion)

Explanation:

BRAINLIEST ??

as much wood as a woodchuck could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood.

sadly it cannot chuck wood

you should go do that

explanation: