Make a list of ten people you want to test the Serial Position Effect on. Use this sheet to record the names and data you collect.
Prepare yourself to say this phrase:
"I am doing an experiment on lists for school. I am going to read a list of words to you. I want you to listen to the words. When I am finished, I want you to write down as many of the words as you remember, in the order in which you heard them. You will have thirty seconds to write them down."
Note: The key here is to not give away the fact that you're testing the person's memory. When people find out you're testing their memory, they'll try extra hard to remember. It might mess up your results. That's why you just need to tell your ten test subjects that you're experimenting with a list. Later, you'll tell them you're testing their memory. But not now.

Give a piece of paper and a pencil to the people you're testing.
Say the phrase:
" I am doing an experiment on lists for school. I am going to read a list of words to you. I want you to listen to the words. When I am finished, I want you to write down as many of the words as you remember, in the order in which you heard them. You will have thirty seconds to write them down."
Read your list of words to your person.
Don't read too fast.
Have the person write down the words he/she remembers, in the order heard.
You may count to thirty in you head, or use a watch. But tell the person to stop writing at the end of thirty seconds.
Collect the paper.
Thank the person for their time, and let them know you'll use their paper to analyze if people are more likely to remember the beginning and ending words of a list.

How do prepositions function in a sentence ? check all that aply

Hurry 50pts read the excerpt from justice curtis’s dissenting opinion, then answer the question that follows. slavery, being contrary to natural right, is created only by municipal law. this is not only plain in itself, and agreed by all writers on the subject, but is inferable from the constitution, and has been explicitly declared by this court. the constitution refers to slaves as “persons held to service in one state, under the laws thereof.” . . . . it was certainly understood by the convention which framed the constitution, and has been so understood ever since, that, under the power to regulate commerce, congress could prohibit the importation of slaves; and the exercise of the power was restrained till 1808. a citizen of the united states owns slaves in cuba, and brings them to the united states, where they are set free by the legislation of congress. does this legislation deprive him of his property without due process of law? if so, what becomes of the laws prohibiting the slave trade? if not, how can a similar regulation respecting a territory violate the fifth amendment of the constitution? . . for these reasons, i am of opinion that so much of the several acts of congress as prohibited slavery and involuntary servitude within that part of the territory of wisconsin . . were constitutional and valid laws. –dissenting opinion on dred scott v. sandford, justice benjamin curtis which evidence best supports curtis’s opinion that dred scott should be free because he lived in a free territory? check all that apply. “the constitution refers to slaves as ‘persons held to service in one state’” “the convention which framed the constitution . . has . . the power to regulate commerce.” “a citizen of the united states owns slaves in cuba.” “does this legislation deprive him of his property without due process of law? ” “acts of congress as prohibited slavery and involuntary servitude within that part of the territory of wisconsin . . were constitutional and valid laws.”

Some keep the sabbath in surplice - i just wear my wings - and instead of tolling the bell, for church, - our little sexton - sings