SOURCE 1: Rafters of Nostalgia is a strange movie that I hated from beginning to end. For one, the opening scene is not really a scene at all
because the camera just focuses on an old urn resting in the corner of
a dusty cottage for a good 10 minutes. No actors, no action, no
nothing. Just urn. BORING!
SOURCE 2: Rafters of Nostalgia is a work of quiet genius that defies
trends in modern movies. You won't see any explosions or superheroes
here. Its opening scene forces the viewer to gaze upon an urn sitting in
the corner of a house for an uncomfortable 10 minutes, providing an
exhilarating opportunity to question the decreasing attention span of
modern life.
Which statement best synthesizes information from both sources?
A. A person who wants to take a significant other to a movie should
avoid Rafters of Nostalgia.
B. A person who wants to actually enjoy going to the movies should
avoid Rafters of Nostalgia.
C. A person who wants to be challenged by a work of genius should
watch Rafters of Nostalgia.
D. A person who wants a unique movie watching experience should
watch Rafters of Nostalgia.

In the following sentence which word is abstract noun quincy insisted that each one of his teammate members demonstrate loyalty members team quincys loyalty

Nos tuvimos que separar porque nos . a. recién casados b. llevabamos muy mal c. amistad

In just over one hundred years, between 1701 and 1810, 252,500 enslaved africans were brought to barbados—an island that occupies only 166 square miles (making it, today, one of the smallest countries in the world). the english then set out to conquer more sugar islands, starting with jamaica, which they took from spain in 1655. in the same period that the 252,500 africans were brought to barbados, 662,400 africans were taken to jamaica. thus, sugar drove more than 900,000 people into slavery, across the atlantic, to barbados and jamaica—and these were just two of the sugar islands. the english were eagerly filling antigua, nevis, saint kitts, and montserrat with slaves and sugar mills. they took over much of dutch guiana for the same reason. seeing the fortunes being made in sugar, the french started their own scramble to turn the half of the island of hispaniola that they controlled (which is now haiti), as well as martinique, guadeloupe, and french guiana (along the south american coast near dutch guiana), into their own sugar colonies, which were filled with hundreds of thousands more african slaves. by 1753, british ships were taking average of 34,250 slaves from africa every year, and by 1768, that number had reached 53,100. –sugar changed the world, marc aronson and marina budhos how do the authors use historical evidence to support their claim? x(a) they use secondary sources to show how french and english monarchs were indifferent to enslaved people. x(b)they use secondary sources to show that enslaved people often fought for their freedom after arriving in the caribbean. the answer is: (c)they use facts from primary sources to show how countries increased the number of enslaved people to produce more sugar. x(d)they use primary source interviews to show that countries could make more money in trading sugar without using enslaved people.