Explain the debate surrounding The Orbit in London. What do critics say about the tower? What do its fans say? Which side do you agree with? Explain why. Support your response with information from the lesson.

Answer and Explanation:

The debate around The Orbit in London revolves around its function, beauty, message, expense and size. This debate is promoted both by London residents, by art academics and even artists. This is because many people who are critical of the monument believe that it does not make any sense, but it is a big, ugly thing that does not convey any message and that does not match the city with the culture and characteristics of its residents, being a great expense of money that will be obsolete and without understanding forever. However, some fans of the monument believe that it is innovative and that its size represents the grandeur of the city and the event that caused its construction.

In my opinion, a structure that generates discussion, debate and divergence of opinions is a sculpture that is worth appreciating and reflecting, for that reason, I believe that the side of the monument's supporters is the side I fit into.

idk good luck

explanation:

there is a sequence and logical steps to give an answer of a trouble.

1) strategy is necessary to develop an project idea.

2) to study and know the environment where you are going to work ( ecosystem).

3)   the materials resources to built the ideas.

4) to give a priority order in the context that you study. in this case human needs.