In "The Value of a Sherpa Life," Schaffer makes the following claim. … the [climbing] industry clearly values life on a two-tiered basis: Westerners at the top, Sherpas at the bottom.

Which details does Schaffer cite to support this claim? Choose three options.
A. lower pay for Sherpas
B. accidental Sherpa deaths
C. lower standards for rescue insurance for Sherpas
D. lower payouts for Sherpa deaths
E. training in climbing techniques given to Sherpas
F. expressions of sorrow about Sherpa deaths

I think it's C

Explanation:

The question is asking what proves that the Sherpas are seen as less important people to be alive, unlike the Westerners. It can't be A because that is about money. It can't be B because accidental deaths happen everywhere. It can't be D because that's also relating to money. It can't be E because that's the opposite of what the question asked about.

Hope you get it correct! Good luck!

greet them:

buenas noches.

that is considered night time which is when "good night" is used.