In the space below, write a five-paragraph, 600-800 word persuasive essay arguing whether or not your chosen speech is effective in communicating its message, based on how it uses rhetorical strategies.
Include a clear thesis statement identifying whether in your view, the speaker's argument is effective, based on his or
her use of rhetorical strategies. Explain why or why not. Give your audience a sense of closure by providing a clear
conclusion
Throughout the essay, be sure to:
• use formal, objective language for an academic audience,
• connect your ideas using transitions that clearly tie together your ideas,
• base your argument on evidence from the text of the speech, and
• provide a clear conclusion about the speech's effectiveness.
Click here to view the rubric for this assignment.

Did you ever get an answer for this or submit it if so could you please give it to me? I’m in need of it I’m failing right now because of it :(

ha

Explanation:

wordsworth tends to see nature as 'out there'; a presence which surrounds humans, and contributes to human life, but is different from humans. if you look at a typical wordsworth poem (there was a boy, ye knew him well ye rocks) - wordsworth talks about nature as something that needs to be learned about and understood, nature is different from us.  

if you look at a byron poem (the isles of greece is a good one) - byron looks at nature mainly for what it already means to man. wordsworth will look at a landscape and see the mountains, trees, valleys, and rivers as almost spiritual presences - wordsworth wants to get to know nature.  

byron will look at the same landscape and he will want to know who lives there, what are the villages? are there any farms or mines, is there some history?  

wordsworth looks at nature for what it is; byron is forever asking what it means.  

wordsworth thinks that humans are part of nature; byron thinks that nature is part of being human

the answer is b. i read this story before.