.The discussion in this article about the paparazzi and their actions implies to the reader that: A. photographers who go to extreme lengths are in the minority.
B. the laws restricting the paparazzi also restrict the free speech rights of all Americans and therefore should
be declared unconstitutional
C. the Supreme Court is considering the legality of the laws passed since Princess Diana's death.
D. the laws controlling photographers do not affect most citizens on a daily basis

Write a speech about a current practice - anything people commonly do in society today - that you think the people of the future will see as a form of discrimination. what are some practices that are legal today that you think limit people's rights? do you yourself feel you're being treated unfairly? you'll support your ideas with evidence you find through research. you'll also enhance your speech with audio or video.

Read the excerpt from “strychnine in the soup,” in which mr. mulliner explains the ending of a mystery novel to a bar patron who is anxious to know the conclusion of the story. “the plumber forgot his snake and had to go back for it,” explained mr. mulliner. ‘‘i trust that this revelation will prove sedative.” “i feel a new man,” said the draught stout. “i’d have lain awake worrying about that murder all night.” explain how a student who did not know the meaning of sedative could infer its definition?

Name the place where james trained doodle?