In the text, the author discusses how much we know about the adolescent brain and the role it plays in juvenile crimes and rehabilitation. Why do you think courts continue to sentence juvenile offenders as adults, despite this information? Do you think there are circumstances in which it's appropriate to sentence juveniles as adults? Why or why not?

1. Because they cannot act in favor of someone because of their age. Law must be fair for all citizens.

2. Yes, there have been cases where juveniles commit a severe crime, and they're not judged the same way as adults.

Explanation: In recent researches, there has been data that claims that juveniles should not be punished as adults, since they have more vulnerability to external influences and an absence of maturity. However, some courts decide to sentence them equally because they consider it to be unfair not to incarcelate them just because they are underage. There have been occasions where a young criminal comes out as innocent even when they did a serious transgression.

innocence can be defined as the lack of sin, relating it with the lack of guilt, also it can be a synonime of naivety. most people agree that sins are made out of experiences, intentionally or not, as well as you stop being naive once certain things happen to you throughout your life. so, with this explained, the chosen answers are:

when the boy saw the effects of war, he no longer viewed life as innocent.

the loss of innocence is a result of gaining experience and making mistakes.

one way to define innocence is as a lack of worldly experience or sophistication.

the best asnwer is b "les encantan los juguetes nuevos" because you are talking about them