subject
English, 23.11.2020 19:00 batmanmarie2004

4.If you are confused about something in class, don't wait. Raise your hand and ask for help immediately. Do it while your teacher is still explaining the material. Your teacher will probably
be happy that you are taking an active part in your education and should attempt to explain the
material in a different way. If you are still confused, ask your teacher if he or she is available
after class to give you additional instruction. You are worth it. Don't give up on yourself.
What is the narrator's perspective?
How do you know?

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 19:30
What is your interpretation of the purpose of "doris lessing wins nobel prize in literature? " the purpose of the new york times article "doris lessing wins nobel prize in literature" is to explain why lessing is overrated as a writer, the purpose of the new york times article "doris lessing wins nobel prize in literature" is to explain why lessing is underrated as a writer. he purpose of the new york times article "doris lessing wins nobel prize in literature" is to explain how lessing's background plays in her writing career. the purpose of the new york times article "doris lessing wins nobel prize in literature is to explain why lessing did not get married.
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 14:00
How do the historical details in this passage support the authors' claim?
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 15:30
Question 1 of 102 pointswhat can the reading of ancient texts modern readers betterunderstand? ooa. how ancient characters handled conflict differently from todayb. how the quality of literature has declined over the centuriesoc. how biased and prejudiced ancient authors wereod. how the stories from long ago shape the literature of todaysubmit
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 16:30
Which sentence best uses transitions to explain how the evidence supports the reason in the accompanying claim statement? clearly, rainsford did not kill zaroff in self-defense. this statement, therefore, shows that rainsford killed zaroff in self-defense. so, rainsford is not justified because there is no proof he acted in self-defense. in the end, rainsford is not justified in killing zaroff.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
4.If you are confused about something in class, don't wait. Raise your hand and ask for help immedi...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 14.12.2020 22:40
question
Mathematics, 14.12.2020 22:40
Questions on the website: 13722362