What is your view on the ending of the novel “The Skin I’m In”? Are there some aspects of the ending that should have been changed in a more positive or negative way? Is there a character that should have had a better or worse ending? Explain by making reference to the details in the text. Your response should be about 20 – 30 lines

Atahualpaemperor of the inca empire who rose to the throne after winning a civil war between him and his brother.  -he refused to become a spanish vassal or christian.-francisco pizarro kidnapped him and demanded a huge ransom.  -pizarro's secretary described him as "a man of thirty years, good-looking and poised, somewhat stout, with a wide, handsome, and ferocious face, and the eyes flaming with blood."-after the ransom was paid, atahualpa was killed by pizarro

The details that best show evidence of tribal traditions are, "never in the history of his people had a man married a woman who spoke a different tongue” and "it has never been heard," was the verdict of an old man speaking a few weeks later.

-the definition or characteristics of the genre you think the novel fits in