In this section, Grendel is made to seem totally evil, with no redeeming qualities. The narrator tells us that he "relished his savage war on the Danes"
and sought no peace, killing indiscriminately and at will. Do you think that a
character this unilaterally evil is an effective antagonist? What would happen
if Grendel had a "backstory" that gave him a legitimate motive for his
behaviors? What if he had some sympathetic or redeeming qualities

The following question is based on your reading of a midsummer night’s dream by william shakespeare. which line offers the best example of metatheatre? a. “there are things in this comedy of pyramus and thisby that will never . first, pyramus must draw a sword to kill himself; which the ladies cannot abide.” c. “will not the ladies be afeared of the lion? ” b. “doth the moon shine the night we play our play? ” d. “write me a prologue, and let the prologue seem to say, we will do no harm with our swords, and that pyramus is not killed indeed; and for the more better assurance, tell them that i pyramus am not pyramus, but bottom the weaver.”

According to greek religion, what happened to those who did not receive proper burial rites?

The implicit details in this excerpt best support the conclusion that mrs. long feels angry about having to ask to borrow books. the speaker asks for books that were often difficult to find. the speaker appreciates the librarian's efforts to get her books. young children are not allowed to borrow books on their own.