Which of these characteristics does NOT describe the epic poem of the English Anglo/Saxon period? A) They were not written down; rather, they were sung by scops, professional poets.

B) They were short, lyric poems about everyday people of the period.

C) They were long, narrated poems celebrating the deeds of heroic warriors.

The option that does NOT describe the epic poem of the English Anglo/Saxon period is:

B) They were short, lyric poems about everyday people of the period.

Explanation:

We can easily confirm options A and C when researching about epic poems from the Anglo/Saxon period. First, Anglo-Saxon literature was traditionally oral. Poets would memorize the poems and teach them, passing them down from generation to generation. It was only in the 12th century that churchmen began to write down the poems.

Anglo-Saxon literature focused on heroic deeds instead of ordinary people's everyday lives. They would speak of brave warriors and kings, their feats, honor, kinship, and so on. Such poems tended to be long.

Having that in mind, we can easily choose letter B as the one that does NOT describe an epic poem of the Anglo/Saxon period.

on my last

the first proposition is to question economic materialism and victorian christianity. the lines are:

“it moves us not.—great god! i'd rather be

a pagan suckled in a creed outworn; ”

wordsworth is stating that nature no longer interests mankind, that the latter is not “moved” by it and explains that ancient western paganism had a more positive attitude concerning nature since it lacked the perv erted judaeo-christian interpretation of having received the world and all its animals and elements from god to use as we , instead of humans actually being not only part of nature but its wardens, meant to appreciate it and protect it.

the next lines are:

“so might i, standing on this pleasant lea,

have glimpses that would make me less forlorn;

have sight of proteus coming from the sea;

or hear old triton blow his wreathed horn.”

wordsworth here make it very clear that by actually looking and contemplating nature, human beings would reconnect with happiness, serenity and purpose. the use of mythological figures is quite evocative as well, proteus is a greek mythological god of the changing sea. he personifies the sea that changes, which symbolizes the way nature changes and inevitably can change to be destructive not only due to natural causes but to human pollution. furthermore, the sea is even more symbolic since all life originated in the sea so it is not only our past but our future since no life form in our planet can survive without water and if all water is destroyed in earth all life will be gone as well.

he then uses triton which is symbolic of the synthesis of both nature and mankind. triton is a mythological greek god that has the upper body of a man and the lower body of a fish (a merman). this human fish duality evokes the fact that humans are not only human but also part of nature, the fish tail representing nature. the main attribute of this god was that he used a conch shell as a horn to calm the roaring seas. in other words, triton uses nature through science for the benefit of human sailors who risk death during tempests. with the use of such metaphor, wordworth is conveying the message that human technology   is supposed to use nature to preserve nature and thereby humanity as well.