How does literature/logical research inform our ideas about fate vs free will. (Provide an example- text to text or text to world) NOTE YOUR ANSWER MUST BE AT LEAST ONE PARAGRAPH
ONE SENTENCE ANSWER WOULD NOT BE ACCEPTED

Answer and Explanation:

The relationship between destiny and libre arbitrio is very intimate and can often confuse us and make us see these two factors as being the same thing. Literature, however, have the capacity to establish a full difference between these two factors by showing us examples of how to differentiate them and allowing, even that these examples are identifiable in our life. According to the literature, free will is our ability to be free and not submit to fate, but to make fate manipulated by ourselves. We can see an example of this in "Jane Eyre" where, Jane refuses her destiny to be a socially fragile woman and without the ability to take care of herself and makes choices that lead her to be a strong woman and owner of herself. We can also see another example in "Romeo and Juliet" where the two lovers refuse the fate of being separated and choose to be together until after death. There are many other examples that can be cited, but all show the ability of literature to show us that destiny is a factor of free will and not free will a factor of destiny.

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)

the answer is definitely d. sorry for a late response.