2. PART B: Which of the following quotes best supports the answer to Part A?
A "Parris had a slave from the Caribbean named Tituba.
Several of the town's teenage girls began to gather in the
kitchen with Tituba early in 1692." ( Paragraph 2)
B "the young girls who attended the trial were known to
scream and writhe on the floor in the middle of the test."('
Paragraph 4)
C "However, 20 people and 2 dogs were executed for the
crime of witchcraft in Salem. One person was pressed to
death under a pile of stones for refusing to testify." (
Paragraph 9)
D "No one knows the whole truth behind what happened in
Salem. Once witchcraft is ruled out, other important
factors come to light." ( Paragraph 10)

Nthis passage from act iv of romeo and juliet, juliet goes to friar laurence for advice because her father is forcing her to marry count paris. when she gets to the friar’s room, paris is there, arranging for the wedding. which literary technique is used in this exchange between paris and juliet?

In part one of "cruel tribute," how do king aegeus's actions affect the advancement of the plot? he causes ariadne to fall in love with theseus. he causes theseus to become the new king. he causes the birth of a hero in troezen. he causes king minos to become angry.

Read the excerpt from a supporting opinion of the supreme court’s ruling in plessy v. ferguson, 1896. laws permitting, and even requiring, their separation in places where they are liable to be brought into contact do not necessarily imply the inferiority of either race to the other, and have been generally, if not universally, recognized as within the competency of the state legislatures in the exercise of their police power. how does this relate to the premises of brown v. board of education? the brown case addresses whether state legislatures are equipped to judge the quality of education offered at segregated schools. the brown case addresses whether authorities believe that one race is inferior to another when creating public schools. the brown case addresses whether these laws inherently deny certain citizens equal protection under the law. the brown case addresses the legality of using police power to monitor public places separated by race.