What evidence in the excerpt supports Schwartz's claim?

Reliably ensuring safe drinking water to the general public is a vital role of local and state govts. Across the US, govt. officials and public water system managers are discovering means to ensure water security. One technique for increasing public drinking water safety which has got the notice of water officials and the general public is reverting treated waste-water to the drinking water supply.

As California struggles for techniques to cope with its severe drought and the obligatory water limitations imposed, an assortment of ideas which were long let go as controversial, unpleasant, or expensive are getting a second look. One is conserving more water, another is turning to nearby and copious water sources such as the Pacific Ocean into drinking water via desalination, and another is to re-cycle the water citizens have used. And there lies a marketing problem which can be greater than a technological problem.

Water re-cycling is common for uses such as delivering water to golf courses, farms, and zoos and for irrigation purposes. At a grass-root level, activists urge residents to save water from showers, bathroom sinks, washing machines, and tubs to water their gardens and plants. The procedures at Orange County comprise microfiltration which eliminates whatever greater than 0.2 microns, eradicating all suspended solids, protozoa and bacteria.

After which is reverse osmosis that comprise pushing the water across a membrane that eradicates other impurities, as well as pharmaceuticals, dissolved minerals, and viruses. A zap with strong ultraviolet light and little hydrogen peroxide cleanses further and neutralises other small chemical compounds. Alluring people to drink re-cycled water, nevertheless, necessitates getting over what specialists refer to as the ‘yuck’ factor.

From a marketing viewpoint, utilising treated sewage to generate drinking water is a proposal which has proved challenging to sell to consumers. The inevitable prudishness over drinking water which was once waste disregards an essential fact, that when it comes down to it, water is water, and everybody who lives downstream on a river is drinking re-cycled water.

the support that the author, uses in the article facing our fears is a): a definition of the part of the brain called the amygdala.

he takes neuroscientist joseph ledoux's words by telling that by falling to distinguish between evolutionary old systems located in the amygdala and newer systems, centered in the prefrontal cortex, doctors have conflated non conscious threat circuits in the brain with circuits that underlie the conscious experience of fear. that, the author says, "leads ledoux to the jarring conclusion that the amygdala, a decades-old centerpiece of the brain's fear circuit, does not underlie the conscious feeling of fear".

despite this, the author points out in the article that that is a controversial notion and that evidence, in animal and humans, supports the idea that core emotions can exist outside of conscious awareness.

either online or traditional classroom can work for students. which is better will depend on students and teacher. students may have trouble following a lesson in classroom while they can study at their own pace online. other students may have trouble staying focus on their own in online classes. teachers are more used to classroom teaching but they may also be more worry about their jobs teaching online classes and work harder.